Appeal Court Clears Fidelity Bank in Fundamental Rights Case
The Court of Appeal has ruled in favor of Fidelity Bank Plc, dismissing the fundamental rights case brought against the bank by Michael Kundera. The appeal court reversed the previous decision of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, which had found the bank liable for infringing Kundera's fundamental rights.
Fidelity Bank's Defense
Fidelity Bank argued that there was no credible evidence presented in the trial court to establish that the bank had violated Kundera's fundamental rights. The bank maintained that Kundera had failed to prove the bank's involvement or responsibility for the alleged infringement.
Background of Michael Kundera's Case
- Kundera filed the suit in connection with allegations of criminal conduct by entities that had obtained a N100 million loan facility.
- Kundera claimed that the bank had infringed upon his fundamental rights, but the court found no evidence to support these claims.
Appeal Court Decision
The Appeal Court, in its decision, upheld Fidelity Bank's position, dismissing Kundera's allegations and clearing the bank of any responsibility for the infringement of his rights.
Reversal of FCT High Court's Decision
The Appeal Court reversed the previous judgment of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, which had held the bank liable for breaching Kundera's fundamental rights.
Fidelity Bank's Appeal
Fidelity Bank had appealed the decision of the FCT High Court, arguing the lack of evidence to substantiate Kundera's claims against the bank.
Michael Kundera's Claims
Michael Kundera had alleged that the bank had violated his fundamental rights due to its involvement in criminal activities by entities that obtained a N100 million loan facility.
Appeal Court Ruling
The Appeal Court ruled in favor of Fidelity Bank, dismissing Kundera's allegations and absolving the bank of any responsibility for the infringement of his rights.
<small>Source: Daily Post Nigeria — read the original story there.</small>
