Imo State’s government has publicly criticised a directive from the National Judicial Council (NJC) that would shortlist the acting chief judge for a substantive appointment. The criticism comes amid fears that the move could trigger another stalemate, echoing a previous impasse that left the state’s judiciary without a permanent leader for several months.
The NJC, which oversees judicial appointments across Nigeria, has suggested that the acting chief judge be formally considered for the chief judge position. Imo officials have taken issue with the council’s approach, arguing that the process should be more transparent and inclusive of local judicial stakeholders.
Last year, a similar deadlock left Imo’s judiciary without a chief judge, causing delays in court proceedings and uncertainty within the legal community. The current dispute raises concerns that the state could again experience a leadership vacuum.
While the NJC’s mandate is to ensure merit‑based appointments, Imo’s response highlights tensions between federal judicial bodies and state governments over appointment procedures. The state’s stance underscores the need for clearer communication and cooperation to avoid future disruptions.
The situation remains unresolved, with both parties yet to reach a consensus. Observers note that any prolonged stalemate could further impede the administration of justice in Imo State.
<small>Source: Premium Times Nigeria — read the original story there.</small>
