Anthropic and OpenAI have both issued statements urging caution over the rapid development of large language models, but experts say the companies are using the safety debate to win public approval and to set the rules for their own oversight.
According to the Associated Press, analysts and former government evaluators argue that the rhetoric from the two firms is aimed at shaping the unregulated market rather than addressing the technical challenges of AI safety. They point out that both companies have announced plans to develop internal protocols, but critics say these measures may be more about market positioning than genuine risk mitigation.
Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI staff, has highlighted its commitment to “human‑aligned” AI, while OpenAI has reiterated its pledge to “safe and beneficial” artificial intelligence. Both organisations have called for broader industry standards, yet their proposals have been described as self‑serving, designed to give them a competitive edge.
Industry observers note that the lack of regulatory oversight in the AI sector means that companies can set their own safety guidelines. The AP report suggests that the public‑facing narratives from Anthropic and OpenAI may influence policy discussions, potentially giving the firms a hand in defining the rules that will govern future AI deployments.
While the debate over AI safety continues, the AP highlights that the companies’ public statements may be a strategic move to shape the conversation and secure a favorable position in a market where formal regulation is still nascent.
<small>Source: PBS NewsHour — read the original story there.</small>
